Export to CSV

AF2-407 Transition Sort Retool Results -- Reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1

v1.00 released 2023-12-14 11:08

Fall Creek 345 kV

300.0 MW Capacity / 300.0 MW Energy

Introduction

In accordance with Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304, PJM performed load flow analysis (Transition Sort Retool) on all AE1 through AG1 projects that have met eligibility requirements according to Tariff, Part VII, Subpart B, section 303. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a project would be classified as eligible for the Expedited Process (Fast Lane) or if it would be reprioritized to be studied as part of Transition Cycle #1 (TC1) using the criteria from the Expedited Process Eligibility section of Tariff Part VII, section 304. This is not a System Impact Study report.

Below are the results of the study, details of how the study was performed, criterion used in the evaluation of the Expedited Process vs. TC1 determination, and next steps in the interconnection process for your project.

Transition Cycle #1:

The AF2-407 project has not met the Expedited Process Eligibility requirements in Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 and will therefore be reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1. Please see "Transition Cycle #1 Rules" below.

Transition Sort Retool Study Process and Criteria:

In order to determine Expedited Process vs. Transition Cycle #1 classification, projects which met the Transition Eligibility requirements from Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 303 were studied on the base case model that was used for the original System Impact Study analysis. Both a summer peak and light load load flow analysis were performed. Projects that have cost allocation eligibility or are identified as the first to cause a system violation which requires the need for a Network Upgrade with a total estimated cost greater than $5 million will be reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1. All other projects will be eligible for the expedited procedures set forth in Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B).

Expedited Process Eligibility: OATT Tariff Part VII, section 304:

A project is not eligible for the expedited process if it has cost allocation eligibility or is identified as the first to cause, as determined according to Tariff, Part VI, section 217.3, for a Network Upgrade which has a total estimated cost of greater than $5,000,000. Such cost estimate will be based on Transmission Provider's most recently available data.

Not considered in the Transition Sorting: The cost of the Interconnection Facilities is not considered when determining a project's eligibility for the expedited process. Affected Systems upgrade costs are also not considered in the evaluation.

Transition Sort Retool Results Provided:

This report includes a list of:

  1. the overloaded flowgates (overloaded facilities + contingency pair) that the project contributes towards
  2. other interconnection projects that may also contribute to the overloaded facility, and
  3. the total estimated cost for any required Network Upgrades.

Important Notes:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.

Next Steps for your project:

Transition Cycle #1 Rules:

Refer to Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (C) for the Transition Cycle #1 Project Rules.

Transition Cycle #1 will start no later than one year from the Transition Start Date (July 10, 2023). Transition Cycle #1 will run simultaneously with the expedited process, however Transition Cycle #1, Phase III will not begin until all expedited process projects have been completed.

Projects that are reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1 will not need to re-apply to the Interconnection Cycle Process. Therefore, there is no Application Review Phase for Transition Cycle #1. The cycle process for Transition Cycle #1 includes three Study Phases and three Decision Points:

  1. Phase I System Impact Study and Decision Point I; and
  2. Phase II System Impact Study and Decision Point II; and
  3. Phase III System Impact Study and Decision Point III

Refer to Tariff Part VII, Subpart D, section 307 for the Transition Cycle #1 study process.

General

The Interconnection Customer (IC), has proposed a Storage generating facility located in the AEP zone — Madison County, Indiana. The installed facilities will have a total capability of 300.0 MW with 300.0 MW of this output being recognized by PJM as Capacity.

Project Information
Queue Number AF2-407
Project Name Fall Creek 345 kV
Developer Name Juno Power Management LLC
State Indiana
County Madison
Transmission Owner AEP
MFO 300.0 MW
MWE 300.0 MW
MWC 300.0 MW
Fuel Type Storage
Basecase Study Year 2023

Point of Interconnection

AF2-407 will interconnect on the AEP transmission system at the Fall Creek 345 kV substation.

Summer Peak Analysis

The Queue Project was evaluated as a 300.0 MW (Capacity 300.0 MW) injection in the AEP area. Project was evaluated for compliance with applicable reliability planning criteria (PJM, NERC, NERC Regional Reliability Councils, and Transmission Owners). Potential Summer peak period network impacts are listed below:

Important to Note:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.
Summer Peak Analysis
Area Facility Description Contingency Name Contingency Type DC|AC Initial Loading Final Loading Rating (MVA) Rating Type MVA to Mitigate MW Contribution Details
OVEC 06DEARB1-06PIERCE 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
248001 to 248013 ckt 1
DEOK_P2-3_C2 1403_MIAMIFORT
CONTINGENCY 'DEOK_P2-3_C2 1403_MIAMIFORT'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243233 TO BUS 249567 CKT 1   /*05TANNER     345.0 - 08M.FORT     345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 249567 TO BUS 251950 CKT 7   /*08M.FORT     345.0 - 08M.FRT7      22.0
END
Breaker AC 100.1 % 102.56 % 972.0 B 996.88 24.64
OVEC 06DEARB1-06PIERCE 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
248001 to 248013 ckt 1
DEOK_P2-3_C2 1401_MIAMIFORT
CONTINGENCY 'DEOK_P2-3_C2 1401_MIAMIFORT'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243233 TO BUS 249567 CKT 1   /*05TANNER     345.0 - 08M.FORT     345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 249567 TO BUS 250057 CKT 9   /*08M.FORT     345.0 - 08M.FORT     138.0
END
Breaker AC 99.23 % 101.69 % 972.0 B 988.43 24.64
OVEC 06DEARB1-06PIERCE 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
248001 to 248013 ckt 1
DEOK_P7-1_C5 4504MFTANNERS4512EBTANNERS
CONTINGENCY 'DEOK_P7-1_C5 4504MFTANNERS4512EBTANNERS'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243233 TO BUS 249565 CKT 1   /*05TANNER     345.0 - 08EBEND      345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243233 TO BUS 249567 CKT 1   /*05TANNER     345.0 - 08M.FORT     345.0
END
Tower AC 129.22 % 132.64 % 972.0 B 1289.26 32.14
AEP AF1-268 TAP-05JAY 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
946030 to 243319 ckt 1
AEP_P7-1_#11019
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P7-1_#11019'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243225 TO BUS 243232 CKT 1   /*05KEYSTN     345.0 - 05SORENS     345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 944530 TO BUS 243232 CKT 2   /*AF1-118 TAP  345.0 - 05SORENS     345.0
END
Tower AC 122.96 % 126.1 % 409.0 B 515.73 15.08
AEP AF1-268 TAP-05JAY 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
946030 to 243319 ckt 1
AEP_P7-1_#11087-C
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P7-1_#11087-C'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 944530 TO BUS 243232 CKT 2   /*AF1-118 TAP  345.0 - 05SORENS     345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 960970 TO BUS 243225 CKT 1   /*AF2-388 TAP  345.0 - 05KEYSTN     345.0
END
Tower AC 118.71 % 121.85 % 409.0 B 498.36 15.12
AEP AF1-268 TAP-05JAY 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
946030 to 243319 ckt 1
AEP_P7-1_#11087-A-B
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P7-1_#11087-A-B'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243218 TO BUS 945370 CKT 1   /*05DESOTO     345.0 - AF1-202 TAP  345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 958860 TO BUS 944830 CKT 2   /*AF2-177 TAP  345.0 - AF1-148 TAP  345.0
END
Tower AC 97.67 % 100.82 % 409.0 B 412.34 15.12
AEP 05DESOTO-05DESOTO 345.0/138.0 kV Ckt 2 transformer
243218 to 243278 ckt 2
AEP_P7-1_#11019
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P7-1_#11019'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243225 TO BUS 243232 CKT 1   /*05KEYSTN     345.0 - 05SORENS     345.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 944530 TO BUS 243232 CKT 2   /*AF1-118 TAP  345.0 - 05SORENS     345.0
END
Tower AC 105.57 % 107.62 % 675.0 B 726.44 16.29

Light Load Analysis

The Queue Project was evaluated as a 300.0 MW (Capacity 300.0 MW) injection in the AEP area. Project was evaluated for compliance with applicable reliability planning criteria (PJM, NERC, NERC Regional Reliability Councils, and Transmission Owners). Potential light load period network impacts are listed below:

Important to Note:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.
Light Load Analysis
Area Facility Description Contingency Name Contingency Type DC|AC Initial Loading Final Loading Rating (MVA) Rating Type MVA to Mitigate MW Contribution Details
AEP 05ALLEN-05RPMONE 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
243211 to 242933 ckt 1
AEP_P1-2_#7441-B
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P1-2_#7441-B'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 958430 TO BUS 246999 CKT 1   /*AF2-137 TAP  765.0 - 05SORENS     765.0
END
Single DC 142.1 % 144.08 % 897.0 B 1292.4 17.73
AEP 05ALLEN-05RPMONE 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
243211 to 242933 ckt 1
AEP_P1-2_#7441-A
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P1-2_#7441-A'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 242928 TO BUS 958430 CKT 1   /*05MARYSV     765.0 - AF2-137 TAP  765.0
END
Single DC 142.08 % 144.06 % 897.0 B 1292.22 17.73
AEP 05ALLEN-05RPMONE 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
243211 to 242933 ckt 1
AEP_P4_#7445_05MARYSV 765_B-A
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P4_#7445_05MARYSV 765_B-A'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 242922 TO BUS 242928 CKT 1   /*05FLTLCK     765.0 - 05MARYSV     765.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 242928 TO BUS 958430 CKT 1   /*05MARYSV     765.0 - AF2-137 TAP  765.0
END
Breaker AC 118.81 % 120.45 % 897.0 B 1080.44 17.47
AEP/DEI 05EUGENE-08CAYSUB 345.0 kV Ckt 1 line
243221 to 249504 ckt 1
AEP_P1-2_#363
CONTINGENCY 'AEP_P1-2_#363'
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 243208 TO BUS 243209 CKT 1   /*05JEFRSO     765.0 - 05ROCKPT     765.0
END
Single AC 103.19 % 105.08 % 1374.0 B 1443.8 26.8

System Reinforcements

The table below lists all network upgrades which resolve the identified overloaded facilities in this report.

Important to Note:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.
  3. Reinforcements previously identified by Transmission Owners for violations on lower voltage facilities are included in this report. Transmission Owner analysis will be updated as part of the Expedited Process and Transition Cycle 1 retools.
System Reinforcements
RTEP ID Title Total Cost
n7757 Replace the Desoto 138 kV bus 3' AL tubular $100,000
b3103.5 Current AEP End Ratings are S/N :335MVA S/E: 392 MVA 1) Replace 2 risers( Sub cond 1590 AAC 61 Str) at Jay Station $70,000
(TBD) AEP SE rating is 1868 MVA $0
(TBD) MISO end upgrade: Mitigation would be add a new 345kV Circuit in Parallel of existing 345kV line from Cayuga to Eugene. AEP SE rating is 1868 MVA . $12,095,000
n6279.2 A Sag Study will be required on the 8.3 mile section of ACSR ~ 556.5 26/7 ~ [...] n time would be 24 to 36 months after signing an interconnection agreement. $33,200
(TBD) Replace 4 Sub Cond 2000 AAC 91 Str at Jay $400,000
n8196.2 In addition to N8196.1, replace an additional existing double circuit towers with steel double circuit single pole structures on the Allen - RPMone 345kV line. $458,600
n8196.1 AEP will replace two (2) existing double circuit towers with steel double circuit single pole structures on the Allen - RPMone 345kV line. $916,437
n6740 Sag Study - Allen and Rpmone 345 kV line (12.25 miles). Completed, Rate B should be 1057MVA. $49,000
n7881 Replace 16 tangent structures, 3 dead end structures, and conductor over one Ohio river crossing $11,383,000
n6759.2 Replace 2 1600 A switches at Dearborn 345 kV and 4 1600 A switches at Pierce 345kV $9,000,000

Attachments

Conclusion

The Transition Sort load flow retool results indicate that AF2-407 is not eligible for the Expedited Process per PJM Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (A) will be reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1. See next steps for your project in the "Introduction" section above.