Export to CSV

AF2-050 Transition Sort Retool Results -- Reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1

v1.00 released 2023-12-14 11:04

Bearrock-Johnstown 230 kV

30.0 MW Capacity / 50.0 MW Energy

Introduction

In accordance with Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304, PJM performed load flow analysis (Transition Sort Retool) on all AE1 through AG1 projects that have met eligibility requirements according to Tariff, Part VII, Subpart B, section 303. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a project would be classified as eligible for the Expedited Process (Fast Lane) or if it would be reprioritized to be studied as part of Transition Cycle #1 (TC1) using the criteria from the Expedited Process Eligibility section of Tariff Part VII, section 304. This is not a System Impact Study report.

Below are the results of the study, details of how the study was performed, criterion used in the evaluation of the Expedited Process vs. TC1 determination, and next steps in the interconnection process for your project.

Transition Cycle #1:

The AF2-050 project has not met the Expedited Process Eligibility requirements in Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 and will therefore be reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1. Please see "Transition Cycle #1 Rules" below.

Transition Sort Retool Study Process and Criteria:

In order to determine Expedited Process vs. Transition Cycle #1 classification, projects which met the Transition Eligibility requirements from Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 303 were studied on the base case model that was used for the original System Impact Study analysis. Both a summer peak and light load load flow analysis were performed. Projects that have cost allocation eligibility or are identified as the first to cause a system violation which requires the need for a Network Upgrade with a total estimated cost greater than $5 million will be reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1. All other projects will be eligible for the expedited procedures set forth in Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B).

Expedited Process Eligibility: OATT Tariff Part VII, section 304:

A project is not eligible for the expedited process if it has cost allocation eligibility or is identified as the first to cause, as determined according to Tariff, Part VI, section 217.3, for a Network Upgrade which has a total estimated cost of greater than $5,000,000. Such cost estimate will be based on Transmission Provider's most recently available data.

Not considered in the Transition Sorting: The cost of the Interconnection Facilities is not considered when determining a project's eligibility for the expedited process. Affected Systems upgrade costs are also not considered in the evaluation.

Transition Sort Retool Results Provided:

This report includes a list of:

  1. the overloaded flowgates (overloaded facilities + contingency pair) that the project contributes towards
  2. other interconnection projects that may also contribute to the overloaded facility, and
  3. the total estimated cost for any required Network Upgrades.

Important Notes:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.

Next Steps for your project:

Transition Cycle #1 Rules:

Refer to Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (C) for the Transition Cycle #1 Project Rules.

Transition Cycle #1 will start no later than one year from the Transition Start Date (July 10, 2023). Transition Cycle #1 will run simultaneously with the expedited process, however Transition Cycle #1, Phase III will not begin until all expedited process projects have been completed.

Projects that are reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1 will not need to re-apply to the Interconnection Cycle Process. Therefore, there is no Application Review Phase for Transition Cycle #1. The cycle process for Transition Cycle #1 includes three Study Phases and three Decision Points:

  1. Phase I System Impact Study and Decision Point I; and
  2. Phase II System Impact Study and Decision Point II; and
  3. Phase III System Impact Study and Decision Point III

Refer to Tariff Part VII, Subpart D, section 307 for the Transition Cycle #1 study process.

General

The Interconnection Customer (IC) has proposed an uprate to a planned/existing generating facility located in Cambria, Pennsylvania. This project is an increase to the Interconnection Customer's AE2-224 project, which will share the same point of interconnection. The queue position is a 50.0 MW uprate (30.0 MW Capacity uprate) to the previous project. The total installed facilities will have a capability of 150.0 MW with 90.0 MW of this output being recognized by PJM as Capacity. The proposed in-service date for this uprate project is . This study does not imply a TO commitment to this in-service date.

Project Information

Queue Number

AF2-050

Project Name

Bearrock-Johnstown 230 kV

Developer Name

CPV Solar Development LP

State

Pennsylvania

County

Cambria

Transmission Owner

PENELEC

MFO

150.0 MW

MWE

50.0 MW

MWC

30.0 MW

Fuel Type

Solar

Basecase Study Year

2023

 

Point of Interconnection

AF2-050 will interconnect with the PENELEC on transmission system as an uprate to AE2-224 which is tapping the Bear Rock to Johnstown 230 kV line. The AF2-050 project is an uprate to the proposed AE2-224 project and the Point of Interconnection will remain unchanged. The IC will not incur any connection facility upgrade costs for AF2-050 as long as AE2-224 is constructed before or concurrently with AF2-050.

Attachment 1 shows a one-line diagram of the proposed primary Direct Connection facilities for the AE2-224 and AF2-050 generation project to connect to the FirstEnergy (“FE”) Transmission System. The IC will be responsible for constructing the facilities on its side of the POI, including the Attachment Facilities which connect the generator to the FE Transmission System’s Direct Connection facilities.

Summer Peak Analysis

The Queue Project was evaluated as a 50.0 MW (Capacity 30.0 MW) injection in the PENELEC area. Project was evaluated for compliance with applicable reliability planning criteria (PJM, NERC, NERC Regional Reliability Councils, and Transmission Owners). Potential Summer peak period network impacts are listed below:

Important to Note:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.
Summer Peak Analysis
Area Facility Description Contingency Name Contingency Type DC|AC Initial Loading Final Loading Rating (MVA) Rating Type MVA to Mitigate MW Contribution Details
PENELEC/PL 26LEWISTWN-JUNI BU2 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
200513 to 208005 ckt 1
PN_P2-3_PN-115-0331-A
CONTINGENCY 'PN_P2-3_PN-115-0331-A'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200520 TO BUS 938380 CKT 1   /*26ROXBURY    115.0 - AE1-071 TAP  115.0
 OPEN BRANCH FROM BUS 200520 TO BUS 200532 CKT 2         /*26ROXBURY    115.0 - 26ROXBURY    138.0
END
Breaker AC 110.42 % 111.36 % 624.0 B 694.89 6.53
PJM STAR592-KEYSTONE 1.0/500.0 kV Ckt 4 transformer
999401 to 200011 ckt 4
PJM500_PN_P4-500-001A
CONTINGENCY 'PJM500_PN_P4-500-001A'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200011 TO BUS 200810 CKT 3   /*KEYSTONE     500.0 - 26KEYSTONE   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200033                                   /*KEYS G2       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE H FROM BUS 200033                        /*KEYS G2       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE L FROM BUS 200033                        /*KEYS G2       20.0
END
Breaker AC 102.09 % 103.57 % 639.0 B 661.81 9.26
PJM STAR592-KEYSTONE 1.0/500.0 kV Ckt 4 transformer
999401 to 200011 ckt 4
PJM500_PN_P4-500-001D
CONTINGENCY 'PJM500_PN_P4-500-001D'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200011 TO BUS 200810 CKT 3   /*KEYSTONE     500.0 - 26KEYSTONE   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200032                                   /*KEYS G1       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE H FROM BUS 200032                        /*KEYS G1       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE L FROM BUS 200032                        /*KEYS G1       20.0
END
Breaker AC 102.02 % 103.5 % 639.0 B 661.36 9.26
PENELEC 26HOMER CT-26SHELOCTA 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
200767 to 200795 ckt 1
PN_P4-500-002F
CONTINGENCY 'PN_P4-500-002F'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200005 TO BUS 200912 CKT 3   /*CONEM-GH     500.0 - 26CONEMAGH   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200030                                   /*CONE G1       22.0
END
Breaker AC 128.5 % 130.36 % 917.0 B 1195.4 17.65
PENELEC 26HOMER CT-26SHELOCTA 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
200767 to 200795 ckt 1
PN_P4-500-002A
CONTINGENCY 'PN_P4-500-002A'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200005 TO BUS 200912 CKT 3   /*CONEM-GH     500.0 - 26CONEMAGH   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200031                                   /*CONE G2       22.0
END
Breaker AC 128.5 % 130.36 % 917.0 B 1195.4 17.65
PENELEC 26SHELOCTA-26KEYSTONE 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
200795 to 200810 ckt 1
PN_P4-500-002F
CONTINGENCY 'PN_P4-500-002F'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200005 TO BUS 200912 CKT 3   /*CONEM-GH     500.0 - 26CONEMAGH   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200030                                   /*CONE G1       22.0
END
Breaker AC 124.59 % 126.62 % 917.0 B 1161.11 18.17
PENELEC 26SHELOCTA-26KEYSTONE 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
200795 to 200810 ckt 1
PN_P4-500-002A
CONTINGENCY 'PN_P4-500-002A'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200005 TO BUS 200912 CKT 3   /*CONEM-GH     500.0 - 26CONEMAGH   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200031                                   /*CONE G2       22.0
END
Breaker AC 124.59 % 126.62 % 917.0 B 1161.11 18.17
PENELEC 26KEYSTONE-STAR592 230.0/1.0 kV Ckt 4 transformer
200810 to 999401 ckt 4
PJM500_PN_P4-500-001A
CONTINGENCY 'PJM500_PN_P4-500-001A'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200011 TO BUS 200810 CKT 3   /*KEYSTONE     500.0 - 26KEYSTONE   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200033                                   /*KEYS G2       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE H FROM BUS 200033                        /*KEYS G2       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE L FROM BUS 200033                        /*KEYS G2       20.0
END
Breaker AC 102.19 % 103.66 % 639.0 B 662.39 9.26
PENELEC 26KEYSTONE-STAR592 230.0/1.0 kV Ckt 4 transformer
200810 to 999401 ckt 4
PJM500_PN_P4-500-001D
CONTINGENCY 'PJM500_PN_P4-500-001D'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200011 TO BUS 200810 CKT 3   /*KEYSTONE     500.0 - 26KEYSTONE   230.0
 DISCONNECT BUS 200032                                   /*KEYS G1       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE H FROM BUS 200032                        /*KEYS G1       20.0
 REMOVE MACHINE L FROM BUS 200032                        /*KEYS G1       20.0
END
Breaker AC 102.14 % 103.62 % 639.0 B 662.13 9.26
AP/PENELEC 26BLAIRSVL-01SOCIAL 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
200763 to 235253 ckt 1
PN_P4-500-001J
CONTINGENCY 'PN_P4-500-001J'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200011 TO BUS 200810 TO BUS 200907 CKT 4 /*KEYSTONE     500.0 - 26KEYSTONE   230.0 - 26KEYSTN#4    20.0
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 200011 TO BUS 235104 CKT 1          /*KEYSTONE     500.0 - 01CABOT      500.0
 REDUCE BUS 200011 SHUNT BY 100 PERCENT                         /*KEYSTONE     500.0
END
Breaker AC 99.37 % 100.43 % 294.0 B 295.26 3.64

Light Load Analysis

At this time light load analysis not required for this project.

System Reinforcements

The table below lists all network upgrades which resolve the identified overloaded facilities in this report.

Important to Note:

Note for Uprate Projects: Per Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (B), if a project is an uprate (project relies on the Interconnection Facilities of a prior project) whose base project does not qualify for the expedited process, the uprate also will not qualify for the expedited process, regardless of analysis results.

Notes regarding Results displayed:

  1. Some flowgate overloads that a New Service Request contributes to, but does not contribute enough to meet cost allocation eligibility (per Manual 14A, Attachment B.3), may be reported in this Transition Sort report. These types of flowgates do not affect the classification of the New Service Request as either Expedited Process or Transition Cycle #1 because cost allocation eligibility has not been met.
  2. For projects that were determined to not meet Expedited Process eligibility and are being reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1, not all reinforcements in excess of $5,000,000 may be shown in this report. This report may only display a subset of those reinforcements determined to be in excess of $5,000,000 which would classify the project as not meeting Expedited Process Eligibility. This is not a formal System Impact Study.
  3. Reinforcements previously identified by Transmission Owners for violations on lower voltage facilities are included in this report. Transmission Owner analysis will be updated as part of the Expedited Process and Transition Cycle 1 retools.
System Reinforcements
RTEP ID Title Total Cost
b3007.1 Reconductor the Blairsville East to Social Hall 138 kV line and upgrade terminal equipment - AP portion. $4,420,000
b3007.2 Reconductor the Blairsville East to Social Hall 138 kV line and upgrade terminal equipment - PENELEC portion. $7,000,000
s2279.3 Replace line trap at Homer City on the Homer City - Shelocta 230 kV Line. $200,000
n8112 Reconductor/rebuild the Homer City - Shelocta 230 kV (~11 miles) $50,929,813
n8112.1 Adjust/replace relays at Homer City and Shelocta substations. $2,668,506
n8112.2 Replace disconnect switches and substation conductor at Homer City Substation. $3,333,312
n8112.3 Replace disconnect switches and leads at Shelocta Substation $1,744,708
n6818 Rebuild PPL's ~0.9 miles LEWI-JUNI & JUNI-DAUP 230kV line and replace terminal equipment at Juniata 230kV. $7,000,000
n6817.1 Rebuild 24.59 miles of the Lewistown-Juniata 230kV transmission line $105,240,000
s2279.2 Replace line trap at Keystone on the Keystone Shelocta 230 kV Line. $200,000
n8192 Reconductor/rebuild the Shelocta - Keystone 230 kV line (~2.5 miles) $13,311,228
n8192.1 Adjust/replace relaying at Keystone and Shelocta substations. $2,668,506
n8192.7 Replace disconnect switches and leads at Shelocta Substation $1,744,708
n8192.6 Replace breaker leads at Keystone Substation $430,625
n8192.5 Replace disconnect switches at Keystone Substation $2,629,706
n8192.4 Replace bus conductor at Keystone Substation $1,142,812
n8192.3 Replace line drops at Keystone Substation $430,625
n8192.2 Replace substation conductor at Keystone substation $1,142,812
n8281 Replace the Keystone #4 500/230 kV transformer with a larger unit and install a high side breaker $41,580,000

Attachments

One-Line

AF2-050 One-Line.png

Export to CSV Download all tables in report

Uprate Chain
Project Project Status MFO MWE MWC Disposition
AE2-224 In Service 100.0 100.0 60.0 Not Part of Transition
AF2-050 Active 150.0 50.0 30.0 Transition Cycle 1

Conclusion

The Transition Sort load flow retool results indicate that AF2-050 is not eligible for the Expedited Process per PJM Tariff Part VII, Subpart B, section 304 (A) will be reprioritized to Transition Cycle #1. See next steps for your project in the "Introduction" section above.